Comparability of automated drusen volume measurements in age-related macular degeneration: a MACUSTAR study report
Dec 19, 2022Β·,
,,,,,,,,,,Β·
0 min read
Davide Garzone
Jan Henrik Terheyden

Olivier Morelle
Maximilian WM Wintergerst
Marlene SaΓmannshausen
Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg
Maximilian Pfau
Sarah Thiele
Stephen Poor
Sergio Leal
Frank G. Holz
Robert P. Finger
MACUSTAR Consortium
Abstract
Drusen are hallmarks of early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) but their quantification remains a challenge. We compared automated drusen volume measurements between different OCT devices. We included 380 eyes from 200 individuals with bilateral intermediate (iAMD, nβ=β126), early (eAMD, nβ=β25) or no AMD (nβ=β49) from the MACUSTAR study. We assessed OCT scans from Cirrus (200βΓβ200 macular cube, 6βΓβ6 mm; Zeiss Meditec, CA) and Spectralis (20Β°βΓβ20Β°, 25 B-scans; 30Β°βΓβ25Β°, 241 B-scans; Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) devices. Sensitivity and specificity for drusen detection and differences between modalities were assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and mean difference in a 5 mm diameter fovea-centered circle. Specificity wasβ>β90% in the three modalities. In eAMD, we observed highest sensitivity in the denser Spectralis scan (68.1). The two different Spectralis modalities showed a significantly higher agreement in quantifying drusen volume in iAMD (ICC 0.993 [0.991β0.994]) than the dense Spectralis with Cirrus scan (ICC 0.807 [0.757β0.847]). Formulae for drusen volume conversion in iAMD between the two devices are provided. Automated drusen volume measures are not interchangeable between devices and softwares and need to be interpreted with the used imaging devices and software in mind. Accounting for systematic difference between methods increases comparability and conversion formulae are provided. Less dense scans did not affect drusen volume measurements in iAMD but decreased sensitivity for medium drusen in eAMD.
Type
Publication
In Scientific Reports